We can read on Read Write Web another post about web3.0 requesting new definitions:
“Google blog search shows a single post mentioning Web 3.0 in October 2004 (which is notably before CMP applied for the service mark on “Web 2.0“). But by the term’s peak usage in October of last year, there were over 1000 posts talking about the next version of the web. But what were they referring to? That’s a good question.
Last April, we held a contest asking readers to define Web 3.0 and had nearly 50 different responses — clearly, this is something people have a lot of ideas about. The winning entry talked about Web 3.0 as a “decentralized asynchronous me.” Basically, that means a web that understands how to personalize your experience and recommend what you’re looking for, and it’s a definition we’ve used again. But it is one of just many — it would appear that we’re having a hard time deciding where the web is going.”
This is mine:
Web 1.0: They-No interaction. Old portals (Digital media) gave us information. Brands are important.
Web 2.0: We-Interaction. BLOGS(User generated contents). We produce information too. Persons are important.
Web 3.0: She/He. UGC+Autonomous generated content: Collective knowledge is machine distributed. Singularity. Internet is important itself.
I think definitions could be good starpoints about constructing the web we like (or to avoid a future we dislike)
What do you think? Where do you see the web going over the next 5 or 10 years?
More links about web 3.0: Read Write Web:
Discussion
No comments for “Web 3.0, towards a constructed definition”
Post a comment